例句與造句

1. Congress attempted to limit appropriations logrolling via riders with the Line Item Veto Act of 1996.
2. In 1996, Coats cosponsored the Line Item Veto Act of 1996 which President Clinton signed into law.
3. In 1996, the United States Congress passed, and President Bill Clinton signed, the Line Item Veto Act of 1996.
4. In 1997, BLAG filed an amicus brief in " Raines v . Byrd ", an unsuccessful challenge to the Line Item Veto Act of 1996.
5. Another target of his was pork barrel spending by Congress, and he actively supported the Line Item Veto Act of 1996, which gave the president power to veto individual spending items
6. It's difficult to find line item veto act of 1996 in a sentence. 用line item veto act of 1996造句挺難的
7. In 1998, Stone assisted in the briefing of the Rubin V . Snake River Potato Growers case which was a companion case that challenged the Line Item Veto Act of 1996.
8. The Line Item Veto Act of 1996 gave the president the power of Supreme Court on the grounds of it being in violation of the Presentment Clause of the U . S . Constitution.
9. Also, he was one of only two legal scholars to testify against the constitutionality of the Line Item Veto Act of 1996, which the Supreme Court struck down in Clinton v . City of New York.
10. The President of the United States was briefly granted the power to line item veto, by the Line Item Veto Act of 1996, passed by Congress in order to control " pork barrel spending " that favors a particular region rather than the nation as a whole.
11. In 1996, Congress passed, and President Bill Clinton signed, the Line Item Veto Act of 1996, which gave the president the power to veto individual items of Supreme Court subsequently declared the line-item veto unconstitutional as a violation of the Presentment Clause in " Clinton v . City of New York ",.
12. Exemplifying the Court's legal reasoning on this matter, it ruled in the 1998 case " Clinton v . City of New York " that the Line Item Veto Act of 1996, which authorized the President to selectively void portions of appropriation bills, was a violation of the Presentment Clause, which sets forth the formalities governing the passage of legislation.